Press "Enter" to skip to content

The ethics of the transition to football are being examined

The debate over the transfer of players under the age of 18, which has raged for some time at the football administration, was finally published last week after FIFA imposed a severe penalty on Chelsea. The two-window ban by the London Club on the departure of Gael Kaluga Lens from England is perhaps the first blow to war fueled mainly by continental European clubs outraged by British ambassadors. The debate focuses on the complex issues of youth employment, contracts, player rights and pre-clubs.

As an incentive to seek the best talent in the world and reduce the burden of their transfer fees, English clubs have taken advantage of the differences in labor law between the UK and European territories. While the best in the Premier League can sign a practicing contract before the age of 16 and enjoy the protection it offers, clubs in France, Italy, Spain and Germany generally cannot.

Indeed, many continental clubs, such as Barcelona,

​​Which lost Faberge at the age of 16, will not be able to offer players full professional contracts until they reach the age of 16, risking losing their player on their 16th birthday. This is a stash that has brought Cisco Fareast, Federico Machida, Giuseppe Rossi, Gerardo Pique and many others to England in recent years. It is also a situation that has led many clubs, especially those in France, to put their young players on a “contract finder” – a crude pre-contract deal that is largely unenforceable under British law.

However, a decision by FIFA’s Conflict Body on Thursday ruled that Lakota’s pre-contract agreement is not only valid, but that it is an enforceable agreement with his nba중계, Lens. By offering Kaput a salary, Chelsea urged the player to violate the enforcement agreement.

One proposed solution – sponsored by both UEFA Michael Platinum and FIFA Sap Blaster – is a general international ban on player transfers under the age of 18. Groups of players also seem to support this proposal. Gordon Taylor, president of the Professional Footballers Association and president of FoxPro, called for such a move today.

“Overall, there is a feeling that banning players under the age of 18 would be better for the game,” Taylor told Sports week on BBC Radio 5 Live.

“Football is about competition.

 Not all the best youngsters can be in the biggest and richest clubs.” “You have to encourage clubs if they have youth development programs so that they can pick boys and spend time with them. “As they move forward, which can be inevitable, you need a system that pays decent and effective compensation. After all, you can’t stop people from moving, but that’s fair compensation.

“I don’t think the situation with Chelsea would reach the current level if compensation were agreed between the two clubs.”

While banning the transfer of people under the age of 18 may be superficial,

Thus nullifying the robbery instincts of rich, powerful clubs, this is not a situation that can be legally enforced in any other industry. As for Kaput, a contract candidate inserted at the age of 14 would become a three-year employment contract at the age of 17. That is a total of six years when the player is barely in his teens. In every other industry, it is considered child slavery today. A ban would theoretically encourage the continued development of the best young talent. Why do clubs contribute to the training of players when they are allowed to leave without compensation?

But Taylor understands the market so that richer clubs can gather young talent, while the exact same processes are alive and well and enrich its members when the player is no longer considered “young”. Under current rules, this dichotomous nature is unsustainable.

Not surprisingly,

 Clubs like Lens and Le Hare feel cheated by bigger clubs that are eliminating their better young players without paying a transition fee. However, the problem of youth transitions highlighted in the case of Kaput and Paul Pombo is certainly a symptom of an industry that is swollen at the cutting edge. Football as a community has allowed salaries, transfer fees and the constant supply of money from the media to the sector to rise to truly unsustainable levels. At the age of 18, Lakota earns nearly a million pounds a year without hitting the ball for the Chelsea president.

First of all, football needs to become financially sustainable – spend only what it can really afford. Although the leading clubs in the sector are so heavily indebted, it seems unlikely that UEFA or FIFA will work but it will work. Manchester United is one of the few elite clubs in Europe that strictly adhere to the rule that salaries (and bonuses) do not exceed 60% of earnings, despite a £ 700 million debt donated by the Glazers to the club.